<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Venture Math 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/</link>
	<description>Mark MacLeod on funding, growing and exiting startups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5387</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not saying that to come down on anyone . but it&#039;s obvious when you&#039;re more capital limited it means you you&#039;re less willing to take fewer risks and it also means that some entrepreneurs may be less likely to swing for the fences because they may thing that they can&#039;t get the capital they need. You can make the argument that for an entrenepeur&#039;s entrepreneur that none of that matters and they will find away but I&#039;m arguing for fallibility instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying that to come down on anyone . but it&#8217;s obvious when you&#8217;re more capital limited it means you you&#8217;re less willing to take fewer risks and it also means that some entrepreneurs may be less likely to swing for the fences because they may thing that they can&#8217;t get the capital they need. You can make the argument that for an entrenepeur&#8217;s entrepreneur that none of that matters and they will find away but I&#8217;m arguing for fallibility instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5372</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark MacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won&#039;t comment on the last part. Sounds like it is reinforcing some stereotypes. But for sure, if you are in a capital intensive business then you will have an even tougher time raising $ in Canada.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t comment on the last part. Sounds like it is reinforcing some stereotypes. But for sure, if you are in a capital intensive business then you will have an even tougher time raising $ in Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5366</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s wrong about this is that there is a lot more diversity of capital for instance in the states then there is in Canada and the funding ranges differ. So if you&#039;re building a startup like mine which will require very large amounts of capital over time then there is difficulty. Are there lots of bad ideas yes but the sectoral experience isn&#039;t necessarily there and the volume of capital for some companies who either need the capital over time or want to partner with a VC firm for the long haul is not option like it is in California. Also because Canada is not as innovative as some other countries for the time being it is often my conclusion that there is a lack of imagination about ideas or for that matter betting on the wildcards which can turn out to be big wins for the innovative reason as well as the other reasons stated above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong about this is that there is a lot more diversity of capital for instance in the states then there is in Canada and the funding ranges differ. So if you&#8217;re building a startup like mine which will require very large amounts of capital over time then there is difficulty. Are there lots of bad ideas yes but the sectoral experience isn&#8217;t necessarily there and the volume of capital for some companies who either need the capital over time or want to partner with a VC firm for the long haul is not option like it is in California. Also because Canada is not as innovative as some other countries for the time being it is often my conclusion that there is a lack of imagination about ideas or for that matter betting on the wildcards which can turn out to be big wins for the innovative reason as well as the other reasons stated above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology news - Techvibes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5365</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology news - Techvibes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] infamous tweet from David Crow of Omers Ventures, igniting response from the likes of Mark Evans, Mark MacLeod and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] infamous tweet from David Crow of Omers Ventures, igniting response from the likes of Mark Evans, Mark MacLeod and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5318</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark MacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome comments David. Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome comments David. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidcrow</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5316</link>
		<dc:creator>davidcrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry I missed the thesis in the argument. Canadian companies need to go south to raise institutional money?


Raising money is hard. Regardless of that is in Canada or in the US. The secret is to build successful companies. Different companies need to demonstrate success differently at different stages of development. I have actively suggested that Canadian companies get on planes to Boston, NYC, SF, Palo Alto and other places. They should use AngelList, and talk to as many investors and customers as possible. But as you&#039;ll see from opinions like @bfeld:twitter, that http://startupnorth.ca/2013/01/22/the-first-rule-of-real-estate/


&quot;Don’t try to get investors to do unnatural acts: Assuming you are looking for capital, focus your energy on two categories: (1) local investors – either angel or VCs and (2) VCs that are interested in the specific business you are creating.&quot; - @bfeld:twitter


Having a local lead is one way, but not the only way, to get VCs to avoid unnatural acts.


Additionally there might be more capital available through Friends, Family and Fools in other geographies. My argument is that in Boston or SIlicon Valley, many employees have additional disposable income and a relationship with someone that was a founder or an early investor in a company that has had an exit. This makes tech angel investments more familiar and appealing. But I don&#039;t have data to back this up.


Given that YCombinator doesn&#039;t do studies, they make investments, made up data without sources can&#039;t be trusted as anything other than misinformation or hearsay. The specific data you source is from the Kaufmann Institute http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedfiles/kfs_2012_report.pdf not YCombinator. Additional coverage at http://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/2012/09/03/do-older-or-younger-entrepreneurs-have-the-greater-advantage/




I think Canadian entrepreneurs should aim to get as many rejections as possible early. Whether they are at home or abroad. They should also ask for meaningful feedback about the metrics and traction numbers that each investor would like to see to move the business forward. And upon returning to their desks/companies start executing to knock down those metrics. Maybe rather than treating &quot;growth capital&quot; as an entitled right, we should realize that we have to build businesses that earn it. Go out and build a crazy successful business with real customers that is growing like crazy.


And I&#039;m a fake VC (even that gives me too much credit in the VC world, I&#039;m an entrepreneur that is employed by a VC fund). For real VCs follow @derekjsmyth:twitter @howardgwin:twitter @rchabra:disqus @chrisarsenault:disqus  and others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry I missed the thesis in the argument. Canadian companies need to go south to raise institutional money?</p>
<p>Raising money is hard. Regardless of that is in Canada or in the US. The secret is to build successful companies. Different companies need to demonstrate success differently at different stages of development. I have actively suggested that Canadian companies get on planes to Boston, NYC, SF, Palo Alto and other places. They should use AngelList, and talk to as many investors and customers as possible. But as you&#8217;ll see from opinions like @bfeld:twitter, that <a href="http://startupnorth.ca/2013/01/22/the-first-rule-of-real-estate/" rel="nofollow">http://startupnorth.ca/2013/01/22/the-first-rule-of-real-estate/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Don’t try to get investors to do unnatural acts: Assuming you are looking for capital, focus your energy on two categories: (1) local investors – either angel or VCs and (2) VCs that are interested in the specific business you are creating.&#8221; &#8211; @bfeld:twitter</p>
<p>Having a local lead is one way, but not the only way, to get VCs to avoid unnatural acts.</p>
<p>Additionally there might be more capital available through Friends, Family and Fools in other geographies. My argument is that in Boston or SIlicon Valley, many employees have additional disposable income and a relationship with someone that was a founder or an early investor in a company that has had an exit. This makes tech angel investments more familiar and appealing. But I don&#8217;t have data to back this up.</p>
<p>Given that YCombinator doesn&#8217;t do studies, they make investments, made up data without sources can&#8217;t be trusted as anything other than misinformation or hearsay. The specific data you source is from the Kaufmann Institute <a href="http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedfiles/kfs_2012_report.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedfiles/kfs_2012_report.pdf</a> not YCombinator. Additional coverage at <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/2012/09/03/do-older-or-younger-entrepreneurs-have-the-greater-advantage/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/2012/09/03/do-older-or-younger-entrepreneurs-have-the-greater-advantage/</a></p>
<p>I think Canadian entrepreneurs should aim to get as many rejections as possible early. Whether they are at home or abroad. They should also ask for meaningful feedback about the metrics and traction numbers that each investor would like to see to move the business forward. And upon returning to their desks/companies start executing to knock down those metrics. Maybe rather than treating &#8220;growth capital&#8221; as an entitled right, we should realize that we have to build businesses that earn it. Go out and build a crazy successful business with real customers that is growing like crazy.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m a fake VC (even that gives me too much credit in the VC world, I&#8217;m an entrepreneur that is employed by a VC fund). For real VCs follow @derekjsmyth:twitter @howardgwin:twitter @rchabra:disqus @chrisarsenault:disqus  and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidcrow</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5315</link>
		<dc:creator>davidcrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good F1 team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good F1 team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evgeny Tchebotarev</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5311</link>
		<dc:creator>Evgeny Tchebotarev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much to pitch in for an LP? JMR-TCH.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much to pitch in for an LP? JMR-TCH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muskie</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5310</link>
		<dc:creator>Muskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know why I was flagged, I don&#039;t know why I was unflagged, I swear Norton just made me jump through hoops to get my contact information. You can try my domain again but as of this morning I&#039;m no longer a threat... http://blog.muschamp.ca/2013/02/14/webmaster-annoyances/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why I was flagged, I don&#8217;t know why I was unflagged, I swear Norton just made me jump through hoops to get my contact information. You can try my domain again but as of this morning I&#8217;m no longer a threat&#8230; <a href="http://blog.muschamp.ca/2013/02/14/webmaster-annoyances/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.muschamp.ca/2013/02/14/webmaster-annoyances/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2013/02/venture-math-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=2323#comment-5308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post Mark. Perhaps a dovetail question is how Canada, with its vast federal grant funding programs such as SR&amp;ED and NRC-IRAP, can stimulate the creation of a larger number of startups that are suitable for VC funding - irrespective of whether the VC is Canadian or otherwise?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Mark. Perhaps a dovetail question is how Canada, with its vast federal grant funding programs such as SR&amp;ED and NRC-IRAP, can stimulate the creation of a larger number of startups that are suitable for VC funding &#8211; irrespective of whether the VC is Canadian or otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
